Departmental newsletters
Recover text and available images for recurring faculty, alumni, and community publications.
Select the option that fits your workflow.
Microsoft Publisher · Universities & Schools
Preserve useful campus publications and make them easier to reuse. Plan a Publisher migration around the newsletters, program guides, and departmental materials your institution still needs.
Turn your publication into editable website content.
Review converted files before printing or publishing.
Supports eligible Microsoft Publisher files. File support, conversion quality, and editability vary by source document and destination. Check text, images, fonts, and layout before use. Additional costs may apply.
Requires a supported Markzware application or MarkzPortal. Desktop and online capabilities vary. The optional WordPress workflow requires OmniMarkz, a compatible AI agent, and WordPress setup. Review all output before printing or publishing.
Publisher files can be scattered across departmental drives, shared folders, and staff archives. A migration works better when teams first identify what exists, who owns it, and which publications must remain editable. Start with a manageable sample rather than rebuilding every file at once.
Recover text and available images for recurring faculty, alumni, and community publications.
Reuse approved descriptions, schedules, and design elements in a supported destination workflow.
Organize legacy publications by department, year, and intended future use.
Reuse selected campus publications as editable WordPress drafts, ready for editorial, accessibility, and layout review before publishing.
Build a migration plan that departments can act on: an inventory, tested output options, and a clear list of publications to preserve, edit, or retire.
Use supported discovery and inventory workflows for the locations available to your team. Agree on access, collection boundaries, and naming conventions before combining departmental results.
Yes. Retain the original .pub files and create separate conversion copies for editing. Select output formats based on the destination application and the publication’s purpose.
No. Editable blocks provide a basis for web editing, but headings, reading order, alt text, links, and the finished page still need an accessibility review.
Start with your files, your intended output, and the people who will review the result.
File support, output quality, and editability depend on the source document, available fonts and assets, and the chosen destination. Review a representative sample before expanding your workflow.
Structured tools for opening, inspecting, converting, and reusing complex publishing documents.